can be used in a purely acoustic analysis or in a coupled
acoustic-structural analysis such as the calculation of shock waves in a fluid
or noise levels in a vibration problem;
is an elastic medium (usually a fluid) in which stress is purely
hydrostatic (no shear stress) and pressure is proportional to volumetric
strain;
is specified as part of a material definition;
must appear in conjunction with a density definition (see
Density);
can include fluid cavitation in
Abaqus/Explicit
when the absolute pressure drops to a limit value;
can be defined as a function of temperature and/or field variables;
can include dissipative effects;
can model small pressure changes (small amplitude excitation);
can model waves in the presence of steady underlying flow of the
medium; and
The equilibrium equation for small motions of a compressible, inviscid fluid flowing
through a resisting matrix material is taken to be
where p is the dynamic pressure in the fluid (the pressure
in excess of any initial static pressure), is the spatial position of the fluid particle, is the fluid particle velocity, is the fluid particle acceleration, is the density of the fluid, and is the “volumetric drag” (force per unit volume per velocity) caused by
the fluid flowing through the matrix material. The d'Alembert term has been written without
convection on the assumption that there is no steady flow of the fluid, which is usually
considered to be sufficiently accurate for steady fluid velocities up to Mach 0.1.
The constitutive behavior of the fluid is assumed to be inviscid and compressible, so that
the bulk modulus of an acoustic medium relates the dynamic pressure in the medium to the
volumetric strain by
where is the volumetric strain. Both the bulk modulus and the density of an acoustic medium must be defined.
The bulk modulus
can be defined as a function of temperature and field variables but does not
vary in value during an implicit dynamic analysis using the subspace projection
method (Implicit Dynamic Analysis Using Direct Integration)
or a direct-solution steady-state dynamic analysis (Direct-Solution Steady-State Dynamic Analysis);
for these procedures the value of the bulk modulus at the beginning of the step
is used.
Volumetric Drag
Dissipation of energy (and attenuation of acoustic waves) may occur in an
acoustic medium due to a variety of factors. Such dissipation effects are
phenomenologically characterized in the frequency domain by the imaginary part
of the propagation constant, which gives an exponential decay in amplitude as a
function of distance. In
Abaqus
the simplest way to model this effect is through a “volumetric drag
coefficient,”
(force per unit volume per velocity).
In frequency-domain procedures,
may be frequency dependent.
can be entered as a function of frequency—,
where f is the frequency in cycles per time (usually
Hz)—in addition to temperature and/or field variables only when the acoustic
medium is used in a steady-state dynamics procedure. If the acoustic medium is
used in a direct-integration dynamic procedure (including
Abaqus/Explicit),
the volumetric drag coefficient is assumed to be independent of frequency and
the first value entered for the current temperature and/or field variable is
used.
In all procedures except direct steady-state dynamics the gradient of
is assumed to be small.
Porous Acoustic Material Models
Porous materials are commonly used to suppress acoustic waves; this
attenuating effect arises from a number of effects as the acoustic fluid
interacts with the solid matrix. For many categories of materials, the solid
matrix can be approximated as either fully rigid compared to the acoustic fluid
or fully limp. In these cases a mechanical model that resolves only acoustic
waves will suffice. The acoustic behavior of porous materials can be modeled in
a variety of ways in
Abaqus/Standard.
Craggs Model
The model discussed in
Craggs
(1978) is readily accommodated in
Abaqus.
Applying this model results in the dynamic equilibrium equation for the fluid
expressed in this form:
where
is the real-valued resistivity, is the real-valued
dimensionless porosity,
is the dimensionless “structure factor,” and
is the dimensionless wave number. This equation can be rewritten as
This model, therefore, can be applied straightforwardly in
Abaqus
by setting the material density equal to , the
volumetric drag equal to , and the
bulk modulus equal to .
The Craggs model is supported for all acoustic procedures in
Abaqus.
Delany-Bazley and Delany-Bazley-Miki Models
Abaqus/Standard
supports the well-known empirical model proposed in
Delany
& Bazley (1970), which determines the material properties as a
function of frequency and user-defined flow resistivity,
;
density, ;
and bulk modulus, .
A variation on this model, proposed by
Miki
(1990) is also available. These models are supported only for
steady-state dynamic procedures.
Both models compute frequency-dependent material characteristic impedance,
,
and wavenumber or propagation constant, ,
according to the following formula:
where
and
The constants are as given in the table below:
Delany- Bazley
0.0978
–0.7
0.189
–0.595
0.0571
–0.754
0.087
–0.732
Miki
0.1227
–0.618
0.1792
–0.618
0.0786
–0.632
0.1205
–0.632
The material characteristic impedance and the wavenumber are converted
internally to complex density and complex bulk modulus for use in
Abaqus.
The signs of the imaginary parts in these formulae are consistent with the
Abaqus
sign convention for time-harmonic dynamics.
General Frequency-Dependent Models
For steady-state dynamic procedures,
Abaqus/Standard
supports general frequency-dependent complex bulk modulus and complex density.
Using these parameters, data from a wide range of models can be accommodated in
an analysis; for example, see
Allard,
et. al (1998),
Attenborough
(1982),
Song
& Bolton (1999), and
Wilson
(1993). These models are used in a variety of applications, such as
ocean acoustics, aerospace, automotive, and architectural acoustic engineering.
The signs of these parameters must be consistent with the sign conventions
used in
Abaqus,
and with conservation of energy.
Abaqus
uses a Fourier transform pair formally equivalent to assuming
time dependence. Consequently, the real parts of the density and bulk modulus
are positive for all values of frequency, the imaginary part of the bulk
modulus must be positive, and the imaginary part of the density must be
negative.
A linear isotropic acoustic material can be fully described with the two
frequency-dependent parameters: bulk modulus, ,
and density, .
It is common, however, to encounter materials defined in terms of other
parameter pairs, such as characteristic impedance, ,
wave number or propagation constant, ,
or speed of sound, .
Data defined with the pair
or
can be converted into the complex density and bulk modulus form, beginning from
the following standard formulae:
Consistent with the
Abaqus
sign conventions, the real parts of
and
must be positive; the imaginary part of
must be negative, and the imaginary part of
must be positive. In commonly observed materials, the ratio of the magnitude of
the imaginary part to the real part for each of these constants is usually much
less than one.
Conversion from Complex Material Impedance and Wavenumber
Since
and
the real and imaginary parts of
are, respectively:
and the real and imaginary parts of
are, respectively:
.
Conversion from Complex Impedance and Speed of Sound
Since
and
the real and imaginary parts of
are, respectively:
and the real and imaginary parts of
are, respectively:
.
Fluid Cavitation
In general, fluids cannot withstand any significant tensile stress and are
likely to undergo large volume expansion when the absolute pressure is close to
or less than zero.
Abaqus/Explicit
allows modeling of this phenomenon through a cavitation pressure limit for the
acoustic medium. When the fluid absolute pressure (sum of the dynamic and
initial static pressures) reduces to this limit, the fluid undergoes free
volume expansion (i.e., cavitation), without a further drop in the pressure. If
this limit is not defined, the fluid is assumed not to undergo cavitation even
under a tensile, negative absolute pressure, condition.
The constitutive behavior for an acoustic medium capable of undergoing
cavitation can be stated as
where a pseudo-pressure ,
a measure of the volumetric strain, is defined as
where
is the fluid cavitation limit and
is the initial acoustic static pressure. A total wave formulation is used for a
nonlinear acoustic medium undergoing cavitation. This formulation is very
similar to the scattered wave formulation except that the pseudo-pressure,
defined as the product of the bulk modulus and the compressive volumetric
strain, plays the role of the material state variable instead of the acoustic
dynamic pressure and the acoustic dynamic pressure is readily available from
this pseudo-pressure subject to the cavitation condition.
Defining the Wave Formulation
In the presence of cavitation in
Abaqus/Explicit
the fluid mechanical behavior is nonlinear. Hence, for an acoustic problem with
incident wave loading and possible cavitation in the fluid, the scattered wave
formulation, which provides a solution for only a scattered wave dynamic
acoustic pressure, may not be appropriate. For these cases the total wave
formulation, which solves for the total dynamic acoustic pressure, should be
selected. See
Acoustic and Shock Loads
for details.
Defining the Initial Acoustic Static Pressure
Cavitation occurs when the absolute pressure reaches the cavitation limit value. Abaqus/Explicit allows for an initial linearly varying hydrostatic pressure in the fluid medium (see
Defining Initial Acoustic Static Pressure). You can specify pressure values at two locations and a node set of the acoustic
medium nodes. Abaqus/Explicit interpolates from these data to initialize the static pressure at all the nodes in the
specified node set. If the pressure at only one location is specified, the hydrostatic
pressure in the fluid is assumed to be uniform. The acoustic static pressure is used only
for determining the cavitation status of the acoustic element nodes and does not apply any
static loads to the acoustic or structural mesh at their common wetted interface.
Defining a Steady Flow Field
Acoustic finite elements can be used to simulate time-harmonic wave
propagation and natural frequency analysis in the presence of a steady mean
flow of the medium. For example, air may move at a speed large enough to affect
the propagation speed of waves in the direction of flow and against it. These
effects are modeled in
Abaqus/Standard
by specifying an acoustic flow velocity during the linear perturbation analysis
step definition; you do not need to alter the acoustic material properties. See
Acoustic, Shock, and Coupled Acoustic-Structural Analysis
for details.
In
Abaqus/Standard
second-order acoustic elements are more accurate than first-order elements. Use
at least six nodes per wavelength
in the acoustic medium to obtain accurate results.
Output
Nodal output variable POR (pressure magnitude) is available for an acoustic medium in
Abaqus (in
Abaqus/CAE
this output variable is called
PAC). When the scattered wave formulation is used with
incident wave loading in
Abaqus/Explicit,
output variable POR represents only the scattered pressure response of the model
and does not include the incident wave loading itself. When the total wave
formulation is used, output variable POR represents the total dynamic acoustic pressure, which includes
contributions from both incident and scattered waves as well as the dynamic
effects of fluid cavitation. For either formulation output variable POR does not include the acoustic static pressure, which is used
only to evaluate the cavitation status in the acoustic medium.
In addition, in
Abaqus/Standard
nodal output variable PPOR (the pressure phase) is available for an acoustic medium. In
Abaqus/Explicit
nodal output variable PABS (the absolute pressure, equal to the sum of POR and the acoustic static pressure) is available for an acoustic
medium.
References
Allard, J.F., M. Henry, J. Tizianel, L. Kelders, and W. Lauriks, “Sound
Propagation in Air-Saturated Random Packings of
Beads,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, vol. 104, no. 42004, 1998.
Attenborough, K.F., “Acoustical
Characterisitics of Rigid Fibrous Absorbents and Granular
Materials,” Journal of the Acoustical Society
of
America, vol. 73, no. 3785, 1982.
Craggs, A., “A
Finite Element Model for Rigid Porous Absorbing
Materials,” Journal of Sound and
Vibration, vol. 61, no. 1101, 1978.
Craggs, A., “Coupling
of Finite Element Acoustic Absorption
Models,” Journal of Sound and
Vibration, vol. 66, no. 4605, 1979.
Delany, M.E., , and E. N. Bazley, “Acoustic
Properties of Fibrous Absorbent
Materials,” Applied
Acoustics, vol. 3105, 1970.
Miki, Y., “Acoustical
Properties of Porous Materials - Modifications of Delany-Bazley
Models,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of
Japan
(E), vol. 11, no. 119, 1990.
Song, B.H., , and J. S. Bolton, “A
Transfer-Matrix Approach for Estimating the Characteristic Impedance and
Wavenumbers of Limp and Rigid Porous
Materials,” Journal of the Acoustical Society
of
America, vol. 107, no. 31131, 1999.
Wilson, D.K., “Relaxation-Matched
Modeling of Propagation through Porous Media, Including Fractal Pore
Structure,” Journal of the Acoustical Society
of
America, vol. 94, no. 21136, 1993.