The classical deviatoric metal creep behavior in
Abaqus/Standard:
can be defined using user subroutine
CREEP or by providing parameters as input for some simple creep
laws;
can model either isotropic creep (using Mises stress potential) or
anisotropic creep (using Hill's anisotropic stress potential);
is active only during steps using the coupled temperature-displacement
procedure, the transient soils consolidation procedure, and the quasi-static
procedure;
requires that the material's elasticity be defined as linear elastic
behavior;
can be modified to implement the auxiliary creep hardening rules
specified in Nuclear Standard NEF 9-5T,
“Guidelines and Procedures for Design of Class 1 Elevated Temperature Nuclear
System Components”; these rules are exercised by means of a constitutive model
developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL – Oak Ridge National Laboratory Constitutive Model);
can be used in combination with creep strain rate control in analyses
in which the creep strain rate must be kept within a certain range; and
can potentially result in errors in calculated creep strains if
anisotropic creep and plasticity occur simultaneously (discussed below).
Rate-dependent gasket behavior in
Abaqus/Standard:
uses unidirectional creep as part of the model of the gasket's
thickness-direction behavior;
can be defined using user subroutine
CREEP or by providing parameters as input for some simple creep
laws;
is active only during steps using the quasi-static procedure; and
requires that an elastic-plastic model be used to define the
rate-independent part of the thickness-direction behavior of the gasket.
Volumetric swelling behavior in
Abaqus/Standard:
can be defined using user subroutine
CREEP or by providing tabular input;
can be either isotropic or anisotropic;
is active only during steps using the coupled temperature-displacement
procedure, the transient soils consolidation procedure, and the quasi-static
procedure; and
requires that the material's elasticity be defined as linear elastic
behavior.
Creep behavior is specified by the equivalent uniaxial behavior—the creep
“law.” In practical cases creep laws are typically of very complex form to fit
experimental data; therefore, the laws are defined with user subroutine
CREEP, as discussed below. Alternatively, five common creep laws
are provided in
Abaqus/Standard:
the power law, the hyperbolic-sine law, the double power law, the Anand law,
and the Darveaux law. These standard creep laws are used for modeling secondary
or steady-state creep. Creep is defined by including creep behavior in the
material model definition (Material Data Definition).
Alternatively, creep can be defined in conjunction with gasket behavior to
define the rate-dependent behavior of a gasket.
Choosing a Creep Model
The power-law creep model is attractive for its simplicity. However, it is
limited in its range of application. The time-hardening version of the
power-law creep model is typically recommended only in cases when the stress
state remains essentially constant. The strain-hardening version of power-law
creep should be used when the stress state varies during an analysis. In the
case where the stress is constant and there are no temperature and/or field
dependencies, the time-hardening and strain-hardening versions of the
power-creep law are equivalent. For either version of the power law, the
stresses should be relatively low.
In regions of high stress, such as around a crack tip, the creep strain
rates frequently show an exponential dependence of stress. The hyperbolic-sine
creep law shows exponential dependence on the stress, ,
at high stress levels (,
where
is the yield stress) and reduces to the power-law at low stress levels (with no
explicit time dependence).
The double power, Anand, and Darveaux models are particularly well suited
for modeling the behavior of solder alloys used in electronic packaging and
have been shown to produce accurate results for a wide range of temperatures
and strain rates.
None of the above models is suitable for modeling creep under cyclic
loading. The ORNL model (ORNL – Oak Ridge National Laboratory Constitutive Model)
is an empirical model for stainless steel that gives approximate results for
cyclic loading without having to perform the cyclic loading numerically.
Generally, creep models for cyclic loading are complicated and must be added to
a model with user subroutine
CREEP or with user subroutine
UMAT.
Modeling Simultaneous Creep and Plasticity
If creep and plasticity occur simultaneously and implicit creep integration
is in effect, both behaviors may interact and a coupled system of constitutive
equations needs to be solved. If creep and plasticity are isotropic,
Abaqus/Standard
properly takes into account such coupled behavior, even if the elasticity is
anisotropic. However, if creep and plasticity are anisotropic,
Abaqus/Standard
integrates the creep equations without taking plasticity into account, which
may lead to substantial errors in the creep strains. This situation develops
only if plasticity and creep are active at the same time, such as would occur
during a long-term load increase; one would not expect to have a problem if
there is a short-term preloading phase in which plasticity dominates, followed
by a creeping phase in which no further yielding occurs. Integration of the
creep laws and rate-dependent plasticity are discussed in
Rate-dependent metal plasticity (creep).
Time Power Law and Power Law Models
The time power law and power law models described below are equivalent to
the “time hardening” and the “strain hardening” forms but avoid their
drawbacks. The time power law and power law models rewrite the laws in such a
way that the typical parameter values do not cause numerical difficulties. In
addition, the units of all of the parameters are physical, which makes unit
conversion easier if it is required.
Time Power Law Model
The time power law model has the following form:
where is Mises equivalent stress or Hill's anisotropic equivalent deviatoric
stress according to whether isotropic or anisotropic creep behavior is defined and , , , and are material parameters.
The model is equivalent to the time hardening form. It is
recommended that you use the time power law model when the value of the
parameter
is very small ().
In this case the equivalent time power law model is obtained by setting
,
keeping the parameters
and
unchanged, and setting
to an arbitrary value greater than zero (typically,
is set to one).
Power Law Model
The power law model has the following form:
where ,
,
and
are defined above; and ,
,
,
and
are material parameters.
This model is equivalent to the strain hardening form. It
is recommended that you use the power law model when the value of the parameter
is very small ().
In this case the equivalent power law model is obtained by setting
,
keeping the parameters
and
unchanged, and setting
to an arbitrary value greater than zero (typically,
is set to one).
Time/Strain Hardening Models
Time hardening and strain hardening models to specify creep are available.
However, to avoid the drawbacks of these models, it is recommended that you use
the time power law and power law models (see
Time Power Law and Power Law Models).
Time Hardening Form
The “time hardening” form is the simpler of the two forms and is defined
as
where
is the uniaxial equivalent creep strain rate,
is the uniaxial equivalent deviatoric stress,
t
is the total or the creep time, and
A, n, and
m
are defined by you as functions of temperature.
For physically reasonable behavior A and n must
be positive and .
Strain Hardening Form
The “strain hardening” form is
where
and
are defined above and
is the equivalent creep strain.
Numerical Difficulties
Depending on the choice of units for either form, the value of
A may be very small for typical creep strain rates. If
A is less than 10−27, numerical difficulties
can cause errors in the material calculations. Therefore, use another system of
units or use the time power law or power law model (described below) to avoid
such difficulties in the calculation of creep strain increments.
Time-Dependent Behavior
In the time hardening form and the time power law model, the
total time or the creep time can be used. The total time is the accumulated
time over all general analysis steps. The creep time is the sum of the times of
the procedures with time-dependent material behavior. If the total time is
used, it is recommended that small step times compared to the creep time be
used for any steps for which creep is not active in an analysis; this is
necessary to avoid changes in hardening behavior in subsequent steps.
Hyperbolic-Sine Law Model
The hyperbolic-sine law is available in the form
where
and
are defined above,
is the temperature,
is the user-defined value of absolute zero on the temperature scale used,
is the activation energy,
R
is the universal gas constant, and
A, B, and
n
are other material parameters.
This model includes temperature dependence, which is apparent in the above
expression; however, the parameters A,
B, n, ,
and R cannot be defined as functions of temperature.
Numerical Difficulties
As with the power law, A may be very small for
typical creep strain rates. If A is very small (such as
less than 10−27), use another system of units to avoid numerical
difficulties in the calculation of creep strain increments.
Anand Model
The Anand model is available in the form
where
,
,
R, ,
and
are defined above,
is the activation energy,
is the deformation resistance, and
,
,
and
are material parameters.
The evolution equation for the deformation resistance,
(initially ),
is
with
where
and ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
are material parameters.
In addition, the initial deformation resistance is a function of temperature
of the form
where ,
,
and
are material parameters.
Darveaux Model
The Darveau model involves both primary and secondary creep. The secondary
creep (steady-state) component is described by a standard hyperbolic sine law
The steady-state law is modified to include the primary creep effects
through
where
,
,
R, Q, ,
and
are defined above,
is the steady-state creep prefactor,
is the steady-state creep power law breakdown, and
,
,
and
are other material parameters.
Double Power Model
The double power law is available in the form
where
,
,
,
and
are defined above,
is the normalized stress, and
,
,
,
,
,
and
are other material parameters.
Anisotropic Creep
Anisotropic creep can be defined to specify the stress ratios that appear in
Hill's function. You must define the ratios
in each direction that will be used to scale the stress value when the creep
strain rate is calculated. The ratios can be defined as constant or dependent
on temperature and other predefined field variables. The ratios are defined
with respect to the user-defined local material directions or the default
directions (see
Orientations).
Further details are provided in
Hill Anisotropic Yield/Creep.
Anisotropic creep is not available when creep is used to define a
rate-dependent gasket behavior since only the gasket thickness-direction
behavior can have rate-dependent behavior.
Volumetric Swelling Behavior
As with the creep laws, volumetric swelling laws are usually complex and are
most conveniently specified in user subroutine
CREEP as discussed below. However, a means of tabular input is
also provided for the form
where
is the volumetric strain rate caused by swelling and ,
,
are predefined
fields such as irradiation fluxes in cases involving nuclear radiation effects.
Up to six predefined fields can be specified.
Volumetric swelling cannot be used to define a rate-dependent gasket
behavior.
Anisotropic Swelling
Anisotropy can easily be included in the swelling behavior. If anisotropic
swelling behavior is defined, the anisotropic swelling strain rate is expressed
as
where
is the volumetric swelling strain rate that you define either directly
(discussed above) or in user subroutine
CREEP. The ratios ,
,
and
are also user-defined. The directions of the components of the swelling strain
rate are defined by the local material directions, which can be either
user-defined or the default directions (see
Orientations).
User Subroutine CREEP
User subroutine
CREEP provides a very general capability for implementing
viscoplastic models such as creep and swelling models in which the strain rate
potential can be written as a function of equivalent pressure stress,
p; the Mises or Hill's equivalent deviatoric stress,
;
and any number of solution-dependent state variables. Solution-dependent state
variables are used in conjunction with the constitutive definition; their
values evolve with the solution and can be defined in this subroutine. Examples
are hardening variables associated with the model.
The user subroutine can also be used to define very general rate- and
time-dependent thickness-direction gasket behavior. When an even more general
form is required for the strain rate potential, user subroutine
UMAT (User-Defined Mechanical Material Behavior)
can be used.
Removing Creep Effects in an Analysis Step
You can specify that no creep (or viscoelastic) response can occur during
certain analysis steps, even if creep (or viscoelastic) material properties
have been defined.
Integration
Explicit integration, implicit integration, or both integration schemes can
be used in a creep analysis, depending on the procedure used, the parameters
specified for the procedure, the presence of plasticity, and whether or not
geometric nonlinearity is requested.
Application of Explicit and Implicit Schemes
Nonlinear creep problems are often solved efficiently by forward-difference
integration of the inelastic strains (the “initial strain” method). This
explicit method is computationally efficient because, unlike implicit methods,
iteration is not required. Although this method is only conditionally stable,
the numerical stability limit of the explicit operator is usually sufficiently
large to allow the solution to be developed in a small number of time
increments.
Abaqus/Standard
uses either an explicit or an implicit integration scheme or switches from
explicit to implicit in the same step. These schemes are outlined first,
followed by a description of which procedures use these integration schemes.
Integration scheme 1: Starts with explicit integration and switches to
implicit integration based on either stability or if plasticity is active. The
stability limit used in explicit integration is discussed in the next section.
Integration scheme 2: Starts with explicit integration and switches to
implicit integration when plasticity is active. The stability criterion does
not play a role here.
The use of the above integration schemes is determined by the procedure
type, your choice of the integration type to be used, as well as whether or not
geometric nonlinearity is requested. For quasi-static and coupled
temperature-displacement procedures, if you do not choose an integration type,
integration scheme 1 is used for a geometrically linear analysis and
integration scheme 3 is used for a geometrically nonlinear analysis. You can
force
Abaqus/Standard
to use explicit integration for creep and swelling effects in coupled
temperature-displacement or quasi-static procedures, when plasticity is not
active throughout the step (integration scheme 2). Explicit integration can be
used regardless of whether or not geometric nonlinearity has been requested
(see
General and Perturbation Procedures).
For a transient soils consolidation procedure, the implicit integration
scheme (integration scheme 3) is always used, irrespective of whether a
geometrically linear or nonlinear analysis is performed.
Automatic Monitoring of Stability Limit during Explicit Integration
Abaqus/Standard
monitors the stability limit automatically during explicit integration. If, at
any point in the model, the creep strain increment
is larger than the total elastic strain, the problem will become unstable.
Therefore, a stable time step, ,
is calculated every increment by
where
is the equivalent total elastic strain at time t, the
beginning of the increment, and
is the equivalent creep strain rate at time t.
Furthermore,
where
is the Mises stress at time t, and
where
is the gradient of the deviatoric stress potential,
is the elasticity matrix, and
is an effective elastic modulus—for isotropic elasticity
can be approximated by Young's modulus.
At every increment for which explicit integration is performed, the stable
time increment, ,
is compared to the critical time increment, ,
which is calculated as follows:
The quantity errtol is an error tolerance that
you define as discussed below. If
is less than ,
is used as the time increment, which would mean that the stability criterion
was limiting the size of the time step further than required by accuracy
considerations.
Abaqus/Standard
will automatically switch to the backward difference operator (the implicit
method, which is unconditionally stable) if
is less than
for nine consecutive increments, you have not restricted
Abaqus/Standard
to explicit integration as discussed above, and there is sufficient time left
in the analysis (time left ).
The stiffness matrix will be reformed at every iteration if the implicit
algorithm is used.
Specifying the Tolerance for Automatic Incrementation
The integration tolerance must be chosen so that increments in stress,
,
are calculated accurately. Consider a one-dimensional example. The stress
increment, ,
is
where ,
,
and
are the uniaxial elastic, total, and creep strain increments, respectively, and
E is the elastic modulus. For
to be calculated accurately, the error in the creep strain increment,
,
must be small compared to ;
that is,
Measuring the error in
as
leads to
You define errtol for the applicable procedure by
choosing an acceptable stress error tolerance and dividing this by a typical
elastic modulus; therefore, it should be a small fraction of the ratio of the
typical stress and the effective elastic modulus in a problem. It is important
to recognize that this approach for selecting a value for
errtol is often very conservative, and acceptable
solutions can usually be obtained with higher values.
Loading Control Using Creep Strain Rate
In superplastic forming a controllable pressure is applied to deform a body.
Superplastic materials can deform to very large strains, provided that the
strain rates of the deformation are maintained within very tight tolerances.
The objective of the superplastic analysis is to predict how the pressure must
be controlled to form the component as fast as possible without exceeding a
superplastic strain rate anywhere in the material.
To achieve this using
Abaqus/Standard,
the controlling algorithm is as follows. During an increment
Abaqus/Standard
calculates ,
the maximum value of the ratio of the equivalent creep strain rate to the
target creep strain rate for any integration point in a specified element set.
If
is less than 0.2 or greater than 3.0 in a given increment, the increment is
abandoned and restarted with the following load modifications:
where p is the new load magnitude and
is the old load magnitude. If ,
the increment is accepted; and at the beginning of the following time
increment, the load magnitudes are modified as follows:
When you activate the above algorithm, the loading in a creep and/or
swelling problem can be controlled on the basis of the maximum equivalent creep
strain rate found in a defined element set. As a minimum requirement, this
method is used to define a target equivalent creep strain rate; however, if
required, it can also be used to define the target creep strain rate as a
function of equivalent creep strain (measured as log strain), temperature, and
other predefined field variables. The creep strain dependency curve at each
temperature must always start at zero equivalent creep strain.
Rate-dependent plasticity (creep and swelling behavior) can be used with any
continuum, shell, membrane, gasket, and beam element in
Abaqus/Standard
that has displacement degrees of freedom. Creep (but not swelling) can also be
defined in the thickness direction of any gasket element in conjunction with
the gasket behavior definition.
Output
In addition to the standard output identifiers available in
Abaqus/Standard
(Abaqus/Standard Output Variable Identifiers),
the following variables relate directly to creep and swelling models:
CEEQ
Equivalent creep strain, .
CESW
Magnitude of swelling strain.
The following output, which is relevant only for an analysis with creep
strain rate loading control as discussed above, is printed at the beginning of
an increment and is written automatically to the results file and output
database file when any output to these files is requested:
RATIO
Maximum value of the ratio of the equivalent creep strain rate to the target
creep strain rate, .
AMPCU
Current value of the solution-dependent amplitude.