Linear
equation of state (EOS) material model with
plasticity.
Problem description
This verification test consists of a list of single-element models that use
either C3D8R or CPE4R elements and are run under simple loading conditions (uniaxial
tension, uniaxial compression, and simple shear). The purpose of this example
is to test the equation of state material model and its combination with the
Mises and Johnson-Cook plasticity models. Two parallel sets of models are
studied. The first set uses the linear elastic, linear elastic with Mises
plastic, and linear elastic with Johnson-Cook plastic materials. The second set
uses the linear
type of EOS, linear
type of EOS with Mises plastic, and linear
type of EOS with Johnson-Cook plastic
materials.
For linear elasticity the volumetric response is defined by
where K is the bulk modulus of the material. The linear
Hugoniot form is
where
is the same as the nominal volumetric strain measure, .
Thus, setting the parameters
0.0 and
0.0 gives the simple hydrostatic bulk response, which is identical to the
elastic volumetric response. The elastic deviatoric response of the material is
defined by the shear modulus.
The elastic material properties are Young's modulus = 207 GPa and Poisson's
ratio = 0.29. The initial material density, ,
is 7890 kg/m3. The equivalent properties for the linear
type of equation of state material model are
= 4563.115 m/s and shear modulus = 80.233 GPa. For models in which plasticity
(including both Mises and Johnson-Cook plasticity models) is used, the plastic
hardening is chosen to be
where
is the yield stress (in units of MPa) and
is the equivalent plastic strain.
Results and discussion
The results obtained from the analyses that use the
EOS material model match the corresponding
results obtained from the analyses that use the linear elasticity model. The
comparison of the pressure and Mises stresses obtained with the
EOS material model (with Johnson-Cook plastic
shear response) and the linear elasticity model (with the same Johnson-Cook
plastic shear response) using the C3D8R element under uniaxial tension loading are shown in
Figure 1
and
Figure 2,
respectively. The uniaxial compression comparisons are shown in
Figure 3
and
Figure 4.
Simple shear test with nonzero initial conditions for
.
Figures
Tabulated equation of state
Elements tested
C3D8R
CPE4R
Features tested
Tabulated equation of state (EOS) material
model with plasticity.
Problem description
This verification test consists of single-element models that use either C3D8R or CPE4R elements and are run under simple loading conditions (uniaxial
tension, uniaxial compression, and simple shear). The purpose of this example
is to test the tabulated EOS material model
and its combination with the Mises and Johnson-Cook plasticity models. Two
parallel sets of models are studied. The first set uses the linear elasticity,
linear elasticity with Mises plasticity, and linear elasticity with
Johnson-Cook plasticity materials. The second set uses the tabulated
EOS, tabulated
EOS with Mises plasticity, and tabulated
EOS with Johnson-Cook plasticity materials.
For linear elasticity the volumetric response is defined by
where K is the bulk modulus of the material. The
tabulated EOS is linear in energy and assumes
the form
where
and
are functions of the logarithmic volumetric strain
only, with ,
and
is the reference density. Thus, setting the functions
and
0.0 gives the simple hydrostatic bulk response, which is identical to the
elastic volumetric response. The elastic deviatoric response of the material is
defined by the shear modulus.
The elastic material properties are Young's modulus = 207 GPa and Poisson's
ratio = 0.29. The initial material density, ,
is 7890 kg/m3. The properties for the tabular
EOS material model are computed using
= 164.286 GPa and shear modulus = 80.233 GPa. For models in which plasticity
(including both Mises and Johnson-Cook plasticity models) is used, the plastic
hardening is chosen to be
where
is the yield stress (in units of MPa) and
is the equivalent plastic strain.
Results and discussion
The results obtained from the analyses that use the
EOS material model match the corresponding
results obtained from the analyses that use the linear elasticity model.
Simple shear test with nonzero initial conditions for
.
P–α equation of state
Elements tested
C3D8R
CPE4R
Features tested
equation of state (EOS) material model.
Problem description
This verification test consists of single-element models that use either C3D8R or CPE4R elements and are run under simple loading conditions (uniaxial,
hydrostatic, and simple shear). The purpose of this example is to test the
equation of state material model and its combination with different models for
the deviatoric behavior: linear elastic, Newtonian viscous shear, and Mises and
Johnson-Cook plasticity; as well as itscombination with different models for
the hydrodynamic response of the solid phase: Mie-Grüneisen and tabulated
equations of state.
The material properties used for the tests are representative of partially
saturated sand. They are summarized below:
Material:
Solid phase
The solid phase is described by a Mie-Grüneisen equation of state:
2070 kg/m3
1480 m/sec
s
1.93
0.880
For models using the tabulated equation of state, the functions
and
are defined such as to provide similar hydrodynamic behavior as the above
Mie-Grüneisen equation of estate.
Compaction
properties
600 m/sec
()
0.049758 (1.052364)
0.0 MPa
6.5 MPa
Viscous shear
behavior
5.0E+4
Elastic shear
behavior
E
124 MPa
0.3
Plasticity
For models with plastic shear behavior (either Mises or Johnson-Cook
plasticity), the plastic hardening is chosen to be
where
is the yield stress (in units of MPa) and
is the equivalent plastic strain. The plasticity models are used in combination
with linear elastic shear behavior.
Results and discussion
The results obtained from the analyses agree well with exact analytical or
approximate solutions. The evolution of the distension
with hydrostatic pressure during a cyclic volumetric test is shown in
Figure 5.
Simple shear test with nonzero initial conditions for
.
Figures
Viscous shear behavior
Elements tested
C3D8R
CPE4R
Features tested
Viscosity models for equation of state materials with viscous shear
behavior.
Problem description
This verification test consists of single-element models that use either C3D8R or CPE4R elements and are run under simple shear loading conditions. The
purpose of this example is to test the different viscosity models for both
Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. The hydrodynamic response of the material
is described by the Mie-Grüneisen equation of state in all cases. Some tests
include thermorheologically simple temperature-dependent viscosity using the
Arrhenius form.
The material properties used for the tests are summarized below:
Material:
Hydrodynamic properties
The hydrodynamic response described by a Mie-Grüneisen equation of state:
2070 kg/m3
1480 m/sec
s
1.93
0.880
Viscous
properties
The properties for each of the tested viscosity models are given below:
Mat1:
Newtonian viscosity:
1 MPa sec
Mat2:
Power Law viscosity:
2.173 MPa (sec)n
0.392
1 MPa sec
0.1 MPa sec
Mat3:
Carreau-Yasuda viscosity:
1 MPa sec
0.1 MPa sec
0.11 sec
0.392
0.644
Mat4:
Cross viscosity:
1 MPa sec
0.1 MPa sec
0.11 sec
0.392
Mat5:
Herschel-Bulkley viscosity:
1 MPa sec
3.59 MPa
2.173 MPa (sec)n
0.392
Mat6:
Ellis-Meter viscosity:
1 MPa sec
0.1 MPa sec
5.665 MPa
0.392
Mat7:
Powell-Eyring viscosity:
1 MPa sec
0.1 MPa sec
0.11 sec
Mat8:
Tabular viscosity:
(MPa sec)
(sec-1)
1.00000
0.0
0.83383
1.0
0.76532
2.0
0.71776
3.0
0.68112
4.0
0.65134
5.0
0.62631
6.0
0.60477
7.0
0.58593
8.0
0.56921
9.0
0.55422
10.0
0.54066
11.0
0.52830
12.0
0.51697
13.0
0.50652
14.0
0.49684
15.0
Mat9:
User-defined Cross viscosity. The viscosity is expressed as
1 MPa sec
0.11 sec
0.392
TRS
properties
Arrhenius form:
109100 joule/mole
308 kelvin
0 kelvin
8.31434 joule/(mole kelvin)
Results and discussion
The results obtained from the analyses agree well with exact analytical or
approximate solutions.
User subroutine
VUVISCOSITY for the user-defined Cross viscosity model used in
eosshrvisc.inp and eosshrvisctrs.inp.
Pressure-dependent shear plasticity
Elements tested
C3D8R
CPE4R
CAX4R
Features tested
Equation of state (EOS) material model with
pressure-dependent (Drucker-Prager) shear plasticity.
Problem description
This verification test consists of single-element models that use either C3D8R, CPE4R, or CAX4R elements and are run under simple loading conditions (uniaxial
tension, uniaxial compression, and simple shear). The purpose of this example
is to test the combination of EOS models for
the volumetric response of the material with the extended Drucker-Prager
pressure-dependent plasticity models for the shear response. Some of the models
also include Johnson-Cook strain-rate dependence in the plasticity definition.
Results and discussion
The results agree well with exact analytical or approximate solutions.
User-defined equation of state (EOS)
material model with plasticity.
Problem description
This verification test consists of single-element models that use either C3D8R or CPE4R elements and are run under simple loading conditions (uniaxial
tension, uniaxial compression, and simple shear). The purpose of this example
is to test the user-defined EOS material model
(user subroutine
VUEOS) and its combination with the Mises and Johnson-Cook
plasticity models. Two parallel sets of models are studied. The first set uses
the linear elasticity, linear elasticity with Mises plasticity, and linear
elasticity with Johnson-Cook plasticity materials. The second set uses the
user-defined EOS, user-defined
EOS with Mises plasticity, and user-defined
EOS with Johnson-Cook plasticity materials.
For linear elasticity the volumetric response is defined by
where K is the bulk modulus of the material. To obtain
the same elastic volumetric response with the user-defined
EOS, the pressure update inside user
subroutine
VUEOS is
where
is the reference density. The user subroutine needs to return the derivative of
pressure with respect to density, ,
which is needed for the the evaluation of the effective moduli of the material
that enters the stable time calculation. User subroutine
VUEOS also returns the derivative of pressure with respect to
the energy, ,
which is usually needed to solve the nonlinear pressure-energy dependency using
the Newton method. In the case considered here, these quantities are
The elastic deviatoric response of an equation of state material can be
defined by using the
ELASTIC, TYPE=SHEAR option.
The elastic material properties are Young's modulus = 207 GPa and Poisson's
ratio = 0.29. The initial material density, ,
is 7890 kg/m3. The properties for the tabular
EOS material model are computed using
= 164.286 GPa and shear modulus = 80.233 GPa. For models in which plasticity is
used (including both Mises and Johnson-Cook plasticity models), the plastic
hardening is chosen to be
where
is the yield stress (in units of MPa) and
is the equivalent plastic strain.
Results and discussion
The results obtained from the analyses that use the
EOS material model match the corresponding
results obtained from the analyses that use the linear elasticity model.