is intended for modeling materials in which significant time-dependent behavior as well
as plasticity is observed, which for metals typically occurs at elevated temperatures;
consists of an elastic-plastic network that is in parallel with an elastic-viscous
network (in contrast to the coupled creep and plasticity capabilities in which the plastic
and the viscous networks are in series);
is based on a Mises or Hill yield condition in the elastic-plastic network and any of the
available creep models in Abaqus/Standard (except the hyperbolic creep law) in the elastic-viscous network;
assumes a deviatoric inelastic response (hence, the pressure-dependent plasticity or
creep models cannot be used to define the behavior of the two networks);
is intended for modeling material response under fluctuating loads over a wide range of
temperatures; and
has been shown to provide good results for thermomechanical loading.
The material behavior is broken down into three parts: elastic, plastic, and viscous. Figure 1 shows a one-dimensional idealization of this material model, with the elastic-plastic and
the elastic-viscous networks in parallel. The following subsections describe the elastic and
the inelastic (plastic and viscous) behavior in detail.
Figure 1. One-dimensional idealization of the two-layer viscoplasticity model.
Elastic Behavior
The elastic part of the response for both networks is specified using a linear isotropic
elasticity definition. Any one of the available elasticity models in Abaqus/Standard can be used to define the elastic behavior of the networks. Referring to the
one-dimensional idealization (Figure 1), the ratio of the elastic modulus of the elastic-viscous network () to the total (instantaneous) modulus () is given by
The user-specified ratio f, given as part of the viscous behavior
definition as discussed later, apportions the total moduli specified for the elastic
behavior among the elastic-viscous and the elastic-plastic networks. As a result, if
isotropic elastic properties are defined, the Poisson's ratios are the same in both
networks. However, if anisotropic elasticity is defined, the same type of anisotropy holds
for both networks. The properties specified for the elastic behavior are assumed to be the
instantaneous properties ().
Property module: material editor: MechanicalElasticityElastic
Plastic Behavior
A plasticity definition can be used to provide the static hardening data for the material
model. All available metal plasticity models, including Hill's plasticity model to define
anisotropic yield (Hill Anisotropic Yield/Creep), can be used.
The elastic-plastic network does not take into account rate-dependent yield. Hence, any
specification of strain rate dependence for the plasticity model is not allowed.
Property module: material editor: MechanicalPlasticityPlastic: SuboptionsPotential
Viscous Behavior
The viscous behavior of the material can be governed by any of the available creep laws
in Abaqus/Standard (Rate-Dependent Plasticity: Creep and Swelling), except the hyperbolic creep law. When you
define the viscous behavior, you specify the viscosity parameters and choose the specific
type of viscous behavior. If you choose to input the creep law through user subroutine
CREEP, only deviatoric creep should
be defined—more specifically, volumetric swelling behavior should not be defined within
user subroutine CREEP. In addition, you also specify
the fraction, f, that defines the ratio of the elastic modulus of the
elastic-viscous network to the total (instantaneous) modulus. Viscous stress ratios can be
specified under the viscous behavior definition to define anisotropic viscosity (see Hill Anisotropic Yield/Creep).
All material properties can be specified as functions of temperature and predefined field
variables.
Property module: material editor: MechanicalPlasticityViscous: Law: Time, Strain, User, Anand, Darveaux, Double Power, Power, or Time Power
Property module: material editor: MechanicalPlasticityViscous: SuboptionsPotential
Time-Dependent Behavior
In the time hardening power law model the total time or the creep time
can be used. The total time is the accumulated time over all general analysis steps. The
creep time is the sum of the times of the procedures with time-dependent material
behavior. If the total time is used, it is recommended that small step times compared to
the creep time be used for any steps for which creep is not active in an analysis; this
is necessary to avoid changes in hardening behavior in subsequent steps.
Property module: material editor: MechanicalPlasticityViscous: Time: Total or Creep
Thermal Expansion
Thermal expansion can be modeled by providing the thermal expansion coefficient of the
material (Thermal Expansion). Anisotropic expansion can be defined
in the usual manner. In the one-dimensional idealization the expansion element is assumed
to be in series with the rest of the network.
Calibration of Material Parameters
The calibration procedure is best explained in the context of the one-dimensional
idealization of the material model. In the following discussion the viscous behavior is
assumed to be governed by the Norton-Hoff rate law, which is given by
In the expression above the subscript V denotes quantities in the
elastic-viscous network alone. This form of the rate law may be chosen, for example, by
choosing a time-hardening power law for the viscous behavior and setting . For this basic case there are six material parameters that need to be
calibrated (Figure 1). These are the elastic properties of the two networks, and ; the initial yield stress ; the hardening ; and the Norton-Hoff rate parameters, A and
n.
The experiment that needs to be performed is uniaxial tension under different constant
strain rates. A static (effectively zero strain rate) uniaxial tension test determines the
long-term modulus, ; the initial yield stress, ; and the hardening, . The hardening is assumed to be linear for illustration purposes. The
material model is not limited to linear hardening, and any general hardening behavior can be
defined for the plasticity model. The instantaneous elastic modulus, , can be measured by measuring the initial elastic response of the material
under nonzero, relatively high, strain rates. Several such measurements at different applied
strain rates can be compared until the instantaneous moduli does not change with a change in
the applied strain rate. The difference between K and determines .
To calibrate the parameters A and n, it is useful
to recognize that the long-term (steady-state) behavior of the elastic-viscous network under
a constant applied strain rate, , is a constant stress of magnitude . Under the assumption that the hardening modulus is negligible compared to
the elastic modulus (), the steady-state response of the overall material is given by
where is the total stress for a given total strain . To determine whether steady state has been reached, one can plot the
quantity as a function of and note when it becomes a constant. The constant value of is equal to . By performing several tests at different values of the constant applied
strain rate , it is possible to determine the constants A and
n.
Material Response in Different Analysis Steps
The material is active during all stress/displacement procedure types. In a static analysis
step where the long-term response is requested (see Static Stress Analysis), only the
elastic-plastic network will be active; the elastic-viscous network will not contribute in
any manner. In particular, the stress in the viscous network will be zero during a long-term
static response. If the creep effects are removed in a coupled temperature-displacement
procedure or a soils consolidation procedure, the response of the elastic-viscous network
will be assumed to be elastic only. During a linear perturbation step, only the elastic
response of the networks is considered.
Some stress/displacement procedure types (coupled temperature-displacement, soils
consolidation, and quasi-static) allow user control of the time integration accuracy of the
viscous constitutive equations through a user-specified error tolerance. In other procedure
types where no such direct control is currently available (static, dynamic), you must choose
appropriate time increments. These time increments must be small compared to the typical
relaxation time of the material.
Elements
The two-layer viscoplastic model is not available for one-dimensional elements (beams and
trusses). It can be used with any other element in Abaqus/Standard that includes mechanical behavior (elements that have displacement degrees of freedom).
Output
In addition to the standard output identifiers available in Abaqus/Standard (Abaqus/Standard Output Variable Identifiers), the following
variables have special meaning for the two-layer viscoplastic material model:
EE
The elastic strain is defined as: .
IE
The all inelastic strain is defined as: .
PE
Plastic strain, , in the elastic-plastic network.
VE
Viscous strain, , in the elastic-viscous network.
PS
Stress, , in the elastic-plastic network.
VS
Stress, , in the elastic-viscous network.
PEEQ
The equivalent plastic strain, defined as .
VEEQ
The equivalent viscous strain, defined as .
SENER
The elastic strain energy density per unit volume, defined as .
PENER
The plastic dissipated energy per unit volume, defined as .
VENER
The viscous dissipated energy per unit volume, defined as .
SDEFRES
Deformation resistance, . This output is relevant only for the Anand model.
The above definitions of the strain tensors imply that the total strain is related to the
elastic, plastic, and viscous strains through the following relation:
where according to the definitions given above and . The above definitions of the output variables apply to all procedure
types. In particular, when the long-term response is requested for a static procedure, the
elastic-viscous network does not carry any stress and the definition of the elastic strain
reduces to , which implies that the total stress is related to the elastic strain
through the instantaneous elastic moduli.
References
Kichenin, J., “Comportement
Thermomécanique du Polyéthylène—Application aux Structures
Gazières,” Thèse de Doctorat de l'Ecole
Polytechnique, Spécialité: Mécanique et
Matériaux, 1992.