Fluid Pipe Equations describes the governing equations for the fluid flow and
pressure drop computation for fluids in pipes. Specifying the Friction Loss Behavior describes the different choices of specifying the frictional loss characteristics for the
flowing fluid in the thermal pipe. You can model additional fluid pressure losses in thermal
fluid pipe elements (see Additional Loss Terms in Fluid Pipe Elements). The governing equations to model temperature evolutions are described in Thermal Fluid Pipe Equations. When using the thermal slurry fluid pipe elements, you can specify the pipe wall section
and convection behavior as described in Specifying the Wall Diameters for Thermal Fluid Pipe Elements and
Specifying the Type of Convection between the Fluid and the Pipe Wall.
When slurry flows through the tubing, pipe, or annulus, the flow conditions might change
and lead to heterogeneous slurry flow and settling of solids. This can be observed in slurry
transport through long horizontal sections at flow velocities too low to maintain the solids
in suspension. Under horizontal flow conditions and the influence of gravity, significant
gradation in the concentration of solids can develop in the form of various slurry flow
regimes (for example, heterogeneous, saltation, or sliding bed). The presence of solid
particles in the slurry generates additional momentum transfer between the particles and
pipe wall, in addition to the transfer between the carrier fluid and pipe wall. The net
effect of the additional transfer mechanism is an increase in pressure drop. Based on the
concept of additive pressure drop, the fractional increase in pressure gradient due to the
presence of solid particles can be added to that produced by interaction of the carrier
fluid with the pipe wall:
where:
-
is the pressure drop of the mixture,
-
is the pressure drop due to the flow of the carrier fluid alone, and
-
is the pressure drop due to the flow of solid particles.
Based on many experimental observations, an extended pressure loss definition was proposed
by Turian and Yuan (1977), to account for various flow regimes often prevailing in the
transport of slurry depending upon flow conditions. The pressure gradient in each flow
regime can be correlated using an equation of the form:
where:
-
is the concentration of proppant particles in the slurry, defined as the
volume ratio of the solid phase to that of the slurry phase (subsequently simply referred
to as the slurry concentration);
-
is the friction factor due to the carrier fluid flow;
-
is the drag coefficient of a single sphere settling at terminal velocity
in an unbounded quiescent fluid; and
-
is the pipe Froude number modified to account for particle density
and is defined as
, where
is the flow velocity,
is gravity, and
is the particle diameter.
Based on the work of Turian and Yuan (1977), the values of these coefficients were defined
for each of the slurry flow regimes, namely sliding bed (Regime 0), saltation (Regime 1),
heterogeneous suspension (Regime 2) and homogeneous suspension (Regime 3):
Sliding Bed (Regime 0 -
):
Saltation (Regime 1 -
):
Heterogeneous suspension (Regime 2 -
):
Homogeneous suspension (Regime 3 -
):
Demarcation of the slurry flow regimes is accomplished by ensuring that any two regimes are
contiguous at their common boundary. This implies that any two regime correlation equations
must be satisfied simultaneously. For example, the boundary demarcating the sliding bed and
saltation regimes must lie along the locus of the equation for regimes
. The transition number demarcating the boundary between the sliding bed (
) and saltation (
) regimes can be written as
Similarly, the equations for other regime transitions can be written as
An important aspect of implementing the approach developed by Turian et al., is a process
by which the flow regime can be readily established. It is possible to identify the
applicable regime for a given set of flowing conditions just from knowledge of the
transition numbers
. For the transition numbers
, where
, the transition number
increases monotonically as the flow velocity increases. At low flow
velocities,
and eventually passes through the value 1.0 with increasing flow velocity.
This indicates a transition out of Regime i. For any combination of
average flow velocity,
, and particle diameter
, the flow regime is fixed according to the constraints:
, the regime is not j; and
, the regime is not i. For further details on the
algorithm, refer to Turian and Yuan (1977).
After the drag coefficient, friction factor, and pipe Froude number are calculated, the
transition numbers are calculated and tested to identify the correct slurry flow regime.
Once the slurry flow regime is established, the slurry friction factor and fractional loss
due to solids are determined.