ProductsAbaqus/StandardAbaqus/ExplicitAbaqus/Aqua
Full submergence of structural members
Elements tested
- B21
- B21H
- B22
- B22H
- B23
- B23H
- B31
- B31H
- B32
- B32H
- B33
- B33H
- ELBOW31
- ELBOW31B
- ELBOW31C
- ELBOW32
- PIPE21
- PIPE21H
- PIPE22
- PIPE22H
- PIPE31
- PIPE31H
- PIPE32
- PIPE32H
- T2D2
- T2D2H
- T2D3
- T2D3H
- T3D2
- T3D2H
- T3D3
- T3D3H
Problem description
The structural member (beam, pipe, elbow, or truss) is kept straight and
constrained, and it is moved to different positions and orientations in
different steps; where appropriate, it is given a uniform velocity and
acceleration. The structural member is subjected to various drag and buoyancy
loads in the different steps. The problems are described in detail in the input
files. The concentrated and distributed load procedures are tested in these
problems. The effective axial force (output variable ESF1) for beam, pipe, and truss elements is also tested.
The features and load types tested in each problem in the various steps are:
-
Buoyancy, PB.
-
Normal drag, static, FDD.
-
Tangential drag, static, FDT.
-
Normal drag, dynamic, FDD.
-
Tangential drag, dynamic, FDT.
-
Inertial drag, FI.
-
Normal drag, dynamic, partial immersion, FDD.
-
End-drag, dynamic, FD1, FD2.
-
End-drag, dynamic, TFD (concentrated load).
-
Inertial end-drag, FI1, FI2.
-
Inertial end-drag, TSI (concentrated load).
-
Transition-section buoyancy, TSB.
-
End-drag, dynamic, (additional test), FD1, FD2.
-
End-drag, dynamic, (additional test), TFD (concentrated load).
-
Wind-drag, dynamic, WDD.
-
Wind end-drag, dynamic, WD1, WD2.
-
Wind end-drag, dynamic, TWD (concentrated load).
The individual steps are named alphabetically as listed above. These names
appear in the step headings.
Model:
Length
|
10
|
Orientation
|
45° with horizontal axis
|
Pipe section data
|
r = 1.0,
t = 0.05
|
Material:
Young's modulus
|
30 × 109
|
Poisson's ratio
|
0.3
|
Aqua – environment
Seabed elevation
|
0.0
|
Mean water elevation
|
40.0
|
Max. water elevation
|
40.0
|
Min. water elevation
|
40.0
|
Gravitational constant
|
32.2
|
Fluid mass density
|
1.987
|
Steady
velocity specification: two-dimensional
|
(,
elevation)
|
(2.0, 1.0, 0.0)
|
(,
elevation)
|
(2.0, 1.0, 2000.0)
|
Steady
velocity specification: three-dimensional
|
(,
,
elevation)
|
(2.0, 1.0, 0.0)
|
(,
,
elevation)
|
(2.0, 1.0, 2000.0)
|
(
= 0.0)
|
Results and discussion
The correct total force can be determined analytically for the simple case
of a straight structural member under drag or buoyancy loads, subjected to a
uniform structural velocity or acceleration immersed in water with a constant
velocity field. In all cases the reaction force at the beam nodes produced by
Abaqus
matches the analytical solution.
The analytically determined results are listed in the headings for each step
in the input files.
Partial submergence of structural members
Elements tested
- B21
- B21H
- B22
- B22H
- B23
- B23H
- B31
- B31H
- B32
- B32H
- B33
- B33H
- T2D2
- T2D2H
- T2D3
- T2D3H
- T3D2
- T3D2H
- T3D3
- T3D3H
Problem description
The structural member is positioned vertically in both the two- and
three-dimensional cases, such that one-half of the structure is below the
seabed and only the top half is subject to fluid loads.
Nodes of each element are constrained to a single node whose reaction force
is monitored.
The features and load types tested in each problem in the various steps are:
-
Static analysis with drag load FDD and no wave loads.
-
Static analysis: dummy step to zero out the loads.
-
Dynamic analysis with inertial load FI.
Model:
Height of the structure
|
2
|
Section data
|
r = 1.0 for
beams, A = 1.0 for trusses
|
Material:
Aqua – environment
Seabed elevation
|
0.0
|
Mean water elevation
|
2.0
|
Gravitational constant
|
32.2
|
Fluid mass density
|
1.99
|
Steady
velocity specification: 2D/3D
|
(,
,
,
elevation)
|
(1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0)
|
(,
,
,
elevation)
|
(1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 2.0)
|
Airy wave parameters
Amplitude
|
0.1
|
Period
|
10.0
|
Phase angle
|
0.0
|
Direction of travel
|
(1.0, 0.0)
|
Results and discussion
The results match the analytically determined reaction force.
Submergence of a rigid box
Elements tested
Problem description
A box composed of three-dimensional rigid elements is immersed in water
subject to a buoyancy load (PB). The buoyancy forces and moments produced are measured by the
reaction force at the rigid body reference node in four distinct
configurations: in the initial configuration, as well as in the configurations
produced when the body is given 60° of heel and then followed by 10° and 20° of
trim.
Results and discussion
The
Abaqus
values for the buoyancy forces match the analytical values exactly. Because
analytical values are not readily available at the moment, these values are
compared with values produced by an independent code and agree to within
one-quarter of 1%. The expected results are listed in the input files.
Spatial variation of steady current velocity
Elements tested
Problem description
Vertical structural members, fully submerged and constrained, are subjected
to a steady current velocity that is uniform with respect to elevation but
varies with position (x-coordinate for two-dimensional
cases, and x- and y-coordinate for
three-dimensional cases). The drag forces on the individual members can be
determined analytically and compared to the nodal reaction forces.
The fluid velocity
is equal to 2.8961.
Model:
Height of the structure
|
10
|
Pipe section data
|
r = 1.0,
t = 0.05
|
Material:
Aqua – environment
Seabed elevation
|
0.0
|
Mean water elevation
|
40.0
|
Gravitational constant
|
32.2
|
Fluid mass density
|
1.987
|
Steady velocity specification: two-dimensional case
(,
,
,
x-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 100.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 300.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 600.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 900.0)
|
Steady velocity specification: three-dimensional case
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 200.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 300.0, 200.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 600.0, 200.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 900.0, 200.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 800.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 300.0, 800.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 600.0, 800.0)
|
(,
,
,
x-coord., y-coord.)
|
(,
0.0, 0.0, 900.0, 800.0)
|
Results and discussion
The results match the analytically determined reaction forces at select
locations.
Dynamic pressure, closed-end buoyancy loads
Elements tested
Problem description
This problem tests the dynamic pressure implementation and closed-end
buoyancy loading for the three
Abaqus/Aqua
wave options. A vertical pile is fully constrained and subjected to buoyancy
loading. The Airy, Stokes, and gridded wave options are used to calculate the
total reaction force on the structure during a direct-integration implicit
dynamic analysis procedure. Distributed load type PB is used with a 50-element model, and concentrated load type TSB is used with a one-element model.
Model:
Height of the structure
|
175.0 (100.0 below and 75.0 above mean
water elevation)
|
Pipe section data
|
r = 1.0,
t = 0.25
|
Material:
Aqua – environment
Seabed elevation
|
100.0
|
Mean water elevation
|
1100.0
|
Gravitational constant
|
32.2
|
Fluid mass density
|
2.0
|
Results and discussion
The results agree well with the analytically determined peak total reaction
force.
Gridded wave file
Problem description
This problem illustrates the creation of the gridded wave file. The
unformatted binary gridded wave files used in
Dynamic pressure, closed-end buoyancy loads
(ep32pxx3.inp
and
ep23pxx3.inp)
are created from ASCII format files containing
the gridded wave data using a Fortran program.
Results and discussion
The files gridwave_3d.binary and gridwave_2d.binary are created for use in
Dynamic pressure, closed-end buoyancy loads.
Miscellaneous partial submergence tests for Stokes waves
Elements tested
Problem description
This problem tests the implementation of the effective axial force output
quantity ESF1. Coincident, one-element, vertical piles are partially
submerged in a Stokes wave field such that the element integration points
change between unsubmerged and submerged conditions during the analysis. The
piles are fully constrained and subjected to distributed load type PB including internal fluid pressure. One pile is completely filled
with internal fluid (Case A), and one is partially filled with internal fluid
such that the element integration point is above the internal fluid free
surface elevation (Case B). An amplitude variation is added to the distributed
load definition in Cases A and B to produce, respectively, Cases C and D. Cases
A and C use PIPE21 elements, and Cases B and D use B21 elements with general beam section to define the element
properties. With the results from this analysis, the effective axial force
output is tested using the postprocessing analysis procedure option.
Results and discussion
The effective axial force, ESF1, agrees with the analytical results for each case. The results
are documented at the top of the
xesf1gen.inp
input file.
Miscellaneous buoyancy loading
Elements tested
Problem description
This problem tests loading types PB and TSB when the fluid properties are prescribed as part of the loading. A
general beam section procedure is used to describe the section properties.
Results and discussion
The results match the analytical solution.
|