ProductsAbaqus/StandardAbaqus/Explicit
The basic hereditary integral formulation for linear isotropic viscoelasticity is
Here and are the mechanical deviatoric and volumetric strains; K is the bulk modulus and G is the shear modulus, which are functions of the reduced time ; and denotes differentiation with respect to .
The reduced time is related to the actual time through the integral differential equation
where is the temperature and is the shift function. (Hence, if , .) A commonly used shift function is the Williams-Landel-Ferry (WLF) equation, which has the following form:
where and are constants and is the “glass” transition temperature. This is the temperature at which, in principle, the behavior of the material changes from glassy to rubbery. If , deformation changes will be elastic. and were once thought to be “universal” constants whose values were obtained at , but these constants have been shown to vary slightly from polymer to polymer.
Abaqus allows the WLF equation to be used with any convenient temperature, other than the glass transition temperature, as the reference temperature. The form of the equation remains the same, but the constants are different. Namely,
where is the reference temperature at which the relaxation data are given, and and are the calibration constants at the reference temperature. The “universal” constants and are related to and as follows:
Other forms of are also used, such as a power series in . Abaqus allows a general definition of the shift function with user subroutine UTRS.
The relaxation functions and can be defined individually in terms of a series of exponentials known as the Prony series:
where and represent the long-term bulk and shear moduli. In general, the relaxation times and need not equal each other; however, Abaqus assumes that . On the other hand, the number of terms in bulk and shear, and , need not equal each other. In fact, in many practical cases it can be assumed that . Hence, we now concentrate on the deviatoric behavior. The equations for the volumetric terms can be derived in an analogous way.
The deviatoric integral equation is
We rewrite this equation in the form
where is the instantaneous shear modulus, is the relative modulus of term i, and
is the viscous (creep) strain in each term of the series. For finite element analysis this equation must be integrated over a finite increment of time. To perform this integration, we will assume that during the increment varies linearly with ; hence, . To use this relation, we break up Equation 2 into two parts:
Now observe that
Use of this expression and the approximation for during the increment yields
The first and last integrals in this expression are readily evaluated, whereas from Equation 2 follows that the second integral represents the viscous strain in the term at the beginning of the increment. Hence, the change in the viscous strain is
If approaches zero, this expression can be approximated by
The last form is used in the computations if .
Hence, in an increment, Equation 3 or Equation 4 is used to calculate the new value of the viscous strains. Equation 1 is then used subsequently to obtain the new value of the stresses.
The tangent modulus is readily derived from these equations by differentiating the deviatoric stress increment, which is
with respect to the deviatoric strain increment . Since the equations are linear, the modulus depends only on the reduced time step:
Finally, one needs a relation between the reduced time increment, , and the actual time increment, . To do this, we observe that varies very nonlinearly with temperature; hence, any direct approximation of is likely to lead to large errors. On the other hand, will generally be a smoothly varying function of temperature that is well approximated by a linear function of temperature over an increment. If we further assume that incrementally the temperature is a linear function of time t, one finds the relation
or
with
This yields the relation
This expression can also be written as
Reduced states of stress
So far, we have discussed full triaxial stress states. If the stress state is reduced (i.e., plane stress or uniaxial stress), the equations derived here cannot be used directly because only the total stress state is reduced, not the individual terms in the series. Therefore, we use the following procedure.
For plane stress let the third component be the zero stress component. At the beginning of the increment we presumably know the volumetric elastic strain , the volumetric viscous strain , and the volumetric viscous strains associated with the Prony series. The total volumetric strain can be obtained by adding together the elastic volumetric strain and the volumetric viscous strain
The deviatoric strain in the 3-direction follows from the relation , which yields:
The out-of-plane deviatoric stress at the end of the increment is
Substituting Equation 3 for , letting , and collecting terms gives
The hydrostatic stress is derived similarly as
We can write these equations in the form
In the third direction the deviatoric stress minus the hydrostatic pressure is zero; hence,
Since , it follows that
from which can be solved. One can then also calculate and , and with Equation 3 or Equation 4 one can update the deviatoric viscous strains . The volumetric strains are obtained with a relation similar to Equation 3.
For uniaxial stress states a similar procedure is used. As before, follows from Equation 5 and and follow from :
Equation 6 and Equation 7 can be used to calculate and , which again leads to Equation 8. Applying Equation 9 for
After this, one can follow the same procedure as for plane stress.